WikiLeaks Reveals Clintons, ISIS Funded from Same Hand

Jonathan Allen writing for Reuters News Service, reveals that The Clinton Foundation has confirmed it accepted some $5 million gifts from Qatar, part of it while Hillary Clinton was U.S. Secretary of State making war policy in the Middle East.  And she prospered without informing the State Department, even though she had promised to let the agency review new or significantly increased support from foreign governments.

WikiLeaks has again done Americans a great favor by exposing Hillary and Bill Clinton’s conflict of interest with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, while Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State.  The conduit for Clinton’s profit was and still is. It was enriched in 2011 by several undisclosed $ million gifts from foreign governments, including The UK, and Saudi Arabia and Saudi’ clone, Qatar.

In this revealing interview by John Pilger on RT.  Wikileaks’ Julian Assange exposes a Clinton email that admits that the governments of our allies, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding ISIL, and, that Clinton has been paid by these governments for political favors.

According to Reuters News Service report on November 5th story,  “the Clinton’s signed an ethics agreement governing her family’s globe-straddling foundation in order to become secretary of state in 2009. The agreement was designed to increase transparency to avoid appearances that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by wealthy donors.”  

Hillary took the money but did not make the reports!  There appears to be multiple incidence of this abuse, according to the Reuters news story.

Further Reuters states: “Qatari officials pledged the money in 2011 to mark the 65th birthday of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton’s husband, and sought to meet the former U.S. president in person the following year to present him the check, according to an email from a foundation official to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta. The email, among thousands hacked from Podesta’s account, was published last month by WikiLeaks.”

Clintons neglected to report what might be a bribe, for the Qatar “gift” called for a face to face meeting with Bill, not Hillary, which meeting the Clintons have neither admitted nor denied.

The Clintons are a team bound together by a money-making Clinton Foundation.  It may be a strange team, but there is no doubt that an undisclosed gift to the foundation is a gift to the then Secretary of State.  A required meeting with Bill with Qatar politicians is pay off for a bribe, whether it is Bill or Hillary who makes the appearance, for what is agreed to at such a meeting may never be known.  The trail of money must be assumed to be paid for a secret purpose.

One should ask, was there a pay back from the Clinton to Qatar or its Saudi ally?  The answer seems to be Yes, Yes, Yes!  Hillary paid off in spades within the year, as  exposed in a September 29, 2012 article by Tony Cartalucci in Global Research, entitled, “Surreal: Clinton Pledges $45 Million in Aid to Al Qaeda in Syria.” The article concludes:

“Hillary Clinton is handing millions in cash to known Al Qaeda terrorists, on the heels of these terrorists claiming one of her own ambassadors in the middle of LIFG’s terror emirate – this while the West berates Iran for supporting the government of Syria as it attempts to defend itself against what is clearly a foreign invasion, not a popular uprising.

“While it may seem an act of unhinged insanity – it is not. It only seems ‘insane’ if one believes the narratives spun by Western politicians who are attempting to sell their agenda from various, not always mutually conducive angles. If one however understands that the corporate-financier interests of Wall Street and London are pursuing global hegemony at any cost, the use of Al Qaeda terrorists who have just led mobs attacking Western consulates across the region that claimed the life of one of America’s own ambassadors makes perfect sense.”

Both Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been implicated many time in financing Al Qaeda and ISIS.  Please consider the favorable arithmetic of the gift to Clinton. According to Cartalucci, Qatar gave the Clinton foundation a total of $5 million over the years, that last million pledged and not reported in 2011.  This is free cash under the complete control of the Clintons.  And at virtually the same time our Secretary of State pledged eight times that amount of US taxpayer’s money to Al Qaida, all money belonging, not to Mrs. Clinton, but the US taxpayers.

It is well established that Al Qaida is a Saudi/Qatar financed front.  One detailed statement of its history is found in June 6, 2016 New Eastern Outlook, which summarizes who controls Al Qaida:

 “The organization grew out of the network of Arab volunteers who had gone to Afghanistan in the 1980s to fight under the banner of Islam against Soviet Communism. During the anti-Soviet jihad Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding. Some analysts believe Bin Laden himself had security training from the CIA.”

Ulson Gunnar, for New Eastern Outlook, concludes:  “Regardless of whether the papers are released, or what their contents may hold, that the US is still to this day involved in propping up a regime openly arming and funding an organization responsible for the worst terrorist attack in US history is an indictment not only the moral bankruptcy of the United States, but of the faltering narrative that it is a force fighting terrorism worldwide rather than one spreading it to the four corners of the globe, and one that must be exposed and stopped.”

One might ask, what should be done to prevent such clever abuse as the Clinton Foundation seems guilty of?  There is already law, called by a frightening ‘T’ word.  Its a word that we rarely use.  We Hold These Truths does not shout ‘treason’ because we can not be sure any of these researchers we quote are totally accurate, but we have known them for a long time and they have always been reliable.

For starters, why should any US elected official, while in office, and for say 10 years after office, be allowed to operate or benefit from a trust that takes one dime from another government or from any corporate lobby interest, including hedge funds, mutual fun and banks.  Violation should be judged under treason statutes.